CONCLUSION

This research began with a lived, recurring experience: During improvisation, I often found my body moving before I had consciously decided to act. Gestures surfaced not from deliberate invention but from something older, patterned, and deeply physical. This raised a central question: How does the body remember and think in motion without external instruction or choreography? Using a Practice-as-Research methodology, I explored how solo improvisation might serve not only as a choreographic tool but also as a site of embodied inquiry. Drawing on Connerton's theory of incorporated memory and Varela, Thompson, and Rosch's model of enactive cognition, I approached the body as an intelligent, responsive system where memory, perception, and decision-making interweave. This research was driven not by theory alone but by the desire to understand what the body already knows and how it reveals that knowledge through movement. 

​

Each of the five improvisational tasks—body mapping, memory-triggered improvisation, sensory reset, memory fragment collage, and interrupting the familiar—offered a unique perspective on this inquiry. I found that memory often emerged not as imagery or narrative but as rhythm, spatial preference, movement quality, and tension. Cognition surfaced not through mental planning but through micro-decisions in perception and adaptation. Interrupting familiar movements revealed new actions discovered through resistance and attention. This affirmed that the solo improvising body is never neutral but shaped by training history, somatic archives, and immediate environmental cues. Rather than producing clear answers, this research sharpened my capacity to dwell on questions and listen to the knowledge made visible through movement. 

​

A key insight was recognising that practice is not merely applying theory but a mode of knowing. The tasks became epistemological tools where memory, habit, choice, and sensation intersected. Improvisation revealed that thinking is not always verbal or rational but physical, intuitive, and enacted through the body's own logic. This reframed improvisation from stylistic experimentation to a cognitive and perceptual process grounded in somatic intelligence. This research contributes to dance and somatic practice by offering a solo, task-based model for accessing embodied knowledge. It also reinforces the view that choreography and cognition are not separate realms but mutually constitutive. For dancers, choreographers, and interdisciplinary researchers, this study affirms that improvisation is both artistic and investigative. It offers a framework for asking what the body knows and how it can think in motion. 

​

Future research might explore how these insights function within group improvisations, where collective dynamics shape embodied thinking. Integrating technologies like motion capture or biofeedback could deepen understanding of real-time decision-making and expand the dialogue between somatic practice and interdisciplinary studies of cognition and movement.